LBE with Rigid Spine Supports Heavy Battle Rattle

Infantry officials at Fort Benning, Ga., have taken an interest in the Integrated Support Exospine — an innovative piece of load-bearing kit designed to lift equipment weight off the shoulders and make it more comfortable to carry. It sounds kinda gimmicky, but soldiers said it works when they tested it late last year during the Army Expeditionary Warfighting Experiment.

I posted a story about it on Military.com yesterday. The Exospine, made by Emerald Touch Inc., is another gear item Fort Benning officials are evaluating in an effort to make the infantry squad more decisive.

“It takes the load off the soldier’s shoulders and lower back and redistributes it to hips and big leg muscles,” said Col. Daniel Barnett, director of the Soldier Requirements Division at Benning’s Maneuver Center of Excellence. “The soldier feedback on that is ‘this is huge.’”

The Exospine is not ready for combat use, but infantry officials say it has the potential to reduce the injuries and fatigue that come with humping heavy gear on extended combat patrols.

 The Exospine features a carbon-fiber frame that supposedly pivots and flexes to allow soldiers to move naturally, says Dr. Michael Glenn, designer of Exospine and a doctor with 21 years in chiropractic medicine. It’s also designed to work with the Army’s IOTV.

Exospine is expensive, though. The prototypes are custom-made right now and cost about $1,200 each. But the cost will likely drop to about $700 under a large military contract, Glenn said. Still pricey, but so is a Gryphon Halfshell by Arc’teryx LEAF.

 

 
 

 

About the Author

Matthew Cox
Matthew Cox has been a defense reporter since 1998 and is an associate editor for Military.com. He traveled to Afghanistan and Iraq numerous times from 2002 to 2008, covering infantry units in combat. Matthew was an infantryman in the 82nd Airborne Division.

15 Comments on "LBE with Rigid Spine Supports Heavy Battle Rattle"

  1. Looks like it was heavily "inspired" by the Archangel system

  2. How about they just lighten the load as opposed to making gadgets that only redistribute the weight? You know, get back to that whole 'light infantry' concept? lol

  3. "Get back" to the concept of light infantry? When were we ever there??

  4. Don't know if it can make you load feel lighter but it looks nice and heavily padded.

  5. Looks great. I don't see how they could implement it with the current Army standards requiring us to carry body armor. Going back to 'light' would be a significant change in doctrine, AGAIN, in the last decade. Besides that, I'm more of an advocate for Mystery Ranch's BASE solution for this problem of the light loads on the upper torso. Still keep the armor on but adds a comfort zone by taking the weight off and instituting a battle belt at the same time.

  6. Brain blast. ******* mortar rounds through Afghan mountain ranges? I think so.
    Mule/donkey might be cheaper though…

  7. Hey looks great but think about the carbon fiber shrapnel you'll receive in a blast to your head and neck. Carbon fiber is not something you want inside you..

  8. Levin Braveaux | April 29, 2012 at 3:02 pm | Reply

    Of course y'all realize that today's American soldier carries roughly the same weight as a Roman leigionnaire did at the time of Christ…Can you really justify the expense, given how much weight you carry on your LBE?

  9. The cost seems way out of line as usual, but anyone that has ever done any backpacking knows that the idea works great and is certainly not new.

  10. I'm probably throwing away a million dollar idea here, but instead of the Army spending $700-$1200 per set of LBE (more ridiculous spending from our senior leaders) why not take a lesson from the folks like Kifaru and Mystery Ranch who make packs for the troops that hold large amounts of weight on a waist belt instead of just on the shoulders.

    Take a battle belt and rig it with a set of stays that are part of an H-harness, or a framesheet. This pseudo-pack frame combination can hold the weight of the body armor and anything hanging off of it. It would work just like the combat packs mentioned above that have the weight of the pack held mainly by the waistbelt. It would also work for times when the body armor is not required.

    And forget about using carbon fiber for whatever solution people come up with. It is too expensive, it only provides torsion rigidity which can be obtained with other methods, and the weight savings aren't worth the cost associated with it, not to mention what happens to it if it breaks or shatters in a combat situation.

    Let's be practical folks, there are solutions out there that are alot cheaper and more dependable than these high-tech things that everyone seems to be coming up with.

  11. Don't worry if it works the arm chair generals in bedroom 4 at FT Benning will come up with even more useless equipment for the soldier to carry.

  12. Of course y'all realize that we have projectile weapons with a little more lethality than they had back in the days of the Legion? I've been in this game for a minute, and never have I been formed into a phalanx with pikes.

    There are two kinds of groundpounder in this load transfer discussion: non-believers and folks who have tried the Crye, Archangel and Kifaru systems.

  13. As a cheap and field expedient option how about removing the MOLLE large ruck from the frame and using just the frame, belt and shoulder straps as an improvised LBE system? If the frame is too rigid and you need to twist your torso more easily, you can buy the Down East Inc DEI 1606 Airborne Assault Frame for $35.91. Would the 1606 rig be perfect? I'm sure it is not. But if your unit could spring for $35.91 to buy one, you could test it out yourself and decide if it's a worthwhile improvement over your existing gear.

  14. I think the compressed disk issue is largely negated with the use of such an innovation because it tries to offload the vertical load forces to the lumbar/pelvic girdle rather then the upper body.

  15. Apparently this was first and they own the patent to it, therefore, Archangel was heavily "inspired" by them.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*