A couple weeks ago I had the great fortune to participate in a two day blogger seminar with the folks from WL Gore — you know, the company that makes the waterproof/breathable membrane used in the best foul weather gear.
While it was in illuminating look under the curtain of a normally secretive company — with tours of their production floor and rainwear test lab in Elkton, Md., and their nearby glove and boot lab – my primary emphasis was on the development and testing of the only Gore camo patterns the company will own up to.
While I tried to pry information out of their military products PR person about what role Gore might be playing in the camo market, I was monumentally unsuccessful. But I did get a lot of great info on a ground-breaking pattern the company developed with some of the best minds in the military camouflage science world.
The two patterns, Optifade Open Country (developed in 2008) and Optifade Forest (released this year) take a radical departure from what most people think of in camo. Both patterns are used exclusively for hunting — the Open Country pattern was developed primarily for hunting elk, antelope, bighorn sheep and other horned game in the mountain environment; the Forest pattern was released this year for the tree stand deer hunter. But each takes the scientific approach on how such animals see color and contrast.
Gore provided a full hunting setup of Optifade Forest gear from their sister company Sitka for me to try out during the season.
Most commercial camo patterns for hunting are so-called “mimicry” patterns — they essentially replicate a photo snapshot of the background and try to match it exactly. That’s fine as long as you don’t move and the background matched perfectly. But in 99.9 percent of situations you’re hunting in, that’s not possible.
I got a good lesson in the science of camouflage and, more importantly for our discussions here, from the man behind the innovation of Optifade, retired Army Lt. Col. Tim O’Neil. Tim is known as the “Father of Digital Camouflage” and worked closely with Gore, the clothing manufacturer Sitka and Guy Cramer, the man who runs Hyperstealth, a Canadian camo innovator.
Tim is a consultant with Gore and continues to work with the company on further camo designs for the civilian market (rumor has it the company is working on a pattern designed to fool a bird’s eyesight to be used for turkey and waterfowl hunters). But he’s also got a close relationship with PEO Soldier and is working as a consultant on the Phase IV camo effort in making sure the Army has good test methodology to evaluate contestants.
I include a video of a brief he gave at the Gore headquarters on Optifade and the advantages of digital camo over other methods. It’s something we should think about as the Army begins to examine camo patterns during the Phase IV program. MultiCam has some digital aspects, but is nowhere near as “digital” as other potential contenders.
I will say that, while weird looking and radically different from anything I’ve hunted in before, the Optifade Forest worked well. I had one big buck bust me at about 10 yards, but it could have been from the contrast of my uncovered face (we were bow hunting at a Gore-sponsored outing in eastern Maryland). But I did end up harvesting a good doe who moseyed by me with about three others, glancing around and completely unaware of my presence.
While it’s rumored that Gore will not offer Optifade for any military camo competition, it’ll be interesting to see if they attend the industry day next week. If their efforts on the science behind Optifade inform the engineering of a military camo for the Army, be prepared for some very intriguing stuff from them.






{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }
I was given a full set of Optifade Sitka gear to test this year hunting here in the Rockies as well. My partners and I found that in almost every situation, Muliticam outperformed it. In some of the sagebrush patches, the Optifade did as well as Muliticam. I also found that Multicam worked better after it faded a little. Optihype is what we ended up calling it. As for $itka, don't get me started.
I hear ya, Wyhunter…still, the fact that Optifade was developed with the science of animal sight in mind is pretty impressive. I'm not sure what research went into MC other than photosimulation tests, but clearly its a functional pattern.
As for Sitka…all the writers at the seminar had the same question: how can you charge so much for this gear in a sport populated by a majority with a Walmart budget (myself included)…?
Well, it's obvious that Gore and the gentleman from HyperStealth have successfully over-scienced ( and over-priced) a solution to a problem that didn't exist.
I think i'll just stick to my mossy oak coveralls when hunting. This stuff is just too expensive. $500 for a jacket is way out of my price range. I have some $60 mossy oak coveralls from bass pro and they have served me well.
Can fool the horned&hoofed may not fool human eyes. Yes it's a matter of "who is seeing the world".Don't forget that they have less overlapping angle of sight than human which effecting the 3D visibility.
It'd be nice to see more A-Tacs Camo applications. I.E. Clothing.
They would need to make environment-specific variants of it, as the one I saw was useful only in certain urban settings……
Heh, looks like everyone missed the most important comment. Camoflage will not help you if you are stupid. Basic stalking techniques regularly outperform what ever camoflage is being used while hunting. As well the caveat that the Optifade was designed to defeat the eyesight of deer and elk, not humans, was apperently overlooked as well.
I fill my tags when I hunt and average shots between 50 and 70 yards without using a stand or hide, and the only camo I wear is a Realtree baseball cap. Apperently flannel is superior to any other camo on the market. :P
The traditional red plaid wool coat might be the best camo for deer hunting. Whitetail deer have an incredible density of rods in their eyes, for low-light vision, as well as having no UV filter in the lens of the eye (humans have such a filter, so, unless we have cataract surgery, we do not see in the ultraviolet.)
Whitetail deer can see in the near-UV. The hunting camo I have tested is largely way too reflective in the UV in areas with foliage or bare ground (most leaves reflect only 3-7% UV) and the wearer is boldly apparent.
But this is a military site. All of the military camo I have tested fails as camouflage in the near-ultraviolet — and inexpensive UV scopes are available to anyone. That is a matter worth correcting; for the deer we always have flannel : )
Oh if only deer could shoot back! Then we'd see how many chest thumping big men there are. -former hunter who hunts 2 legged prey. (Now there is a trophy)
I've stood quiet in the woods with blue jeans a black USMC sweatshirt and an orange vest and had deer walk right up to my spot without seeing me.
It's all a matter of wind direction and being quiet.
Now fighting humans means a different view of the world as far as camo is concerned.